The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of two writ petitions connected with a similar judgment (Hari Ram case), directing respondents to decide pending crop damage claims in accordance with the cited decision.
Writ petitions disposed of in terms of the judgment in Hari Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.; respondents directed to decide pending claim cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:23917]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5174/2024
Kheta Ram S/o Sadul Ram, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kamedia Tehsil Deh District Nagour.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 4)
[2024:RJ-JD:23917]
[CW-5174/2024]
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6377/2022
Versus
(3 of 4)
[2024:RJ-JD:23917]
[CW-5174/2024]
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Ramdev Potalia |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Tirath Raj Singh Sodha |
| Mr. | Mahesh Chandra Bishnoi | |
| Mr. | Mukesh Rajpurohit, DySG | |
| Mr. | Kuldeep Singh Solanki for | |
| Mr. | Manish Patel, AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
27/05/2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present cases is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13349/2022 (Hari Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.) , decided on 08.02.2024 . The operative part of the said judgment reads as under :-
“In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1 & 2 to decide the pending claim case of the petitioner for grant of compensation for the damages of Kharif Crop for the year 2019 at the earliest preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law.
(4 of 4)
[2024:RJ-JD:23917]
[CW-5174/2024]
Needless to say that the documents supplied by the petitioner and the bank for correcting the clerical mistake committed by the bank shall be taken into account by the Committee for deciding the claim case of the petitioner”.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the judgment as has been passed in the case of Hari Ram (supra) .
The respondents shall take a decision in view of the decision rendered by this Court in Hari Ram’s case (supra) .
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
6-SanjayS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petitions should be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in the case of Hari Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hari Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.Followed¶51
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13349/2022 (Hari Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.)
Kheta Ram
Union Of India
State Of Rajasthan
The Nagaur Central Cooperative Bank Ltd.
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Parties & counsel
