This writ petition under Article 226/227, challenging an interim order of the Rent Tribunal, was dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in the second round of hearing, constituting nonprosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:22050]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5121/2020
Vinod Dubey Son Of Shri Birdhi Chand Sharma, Propritor M/s. S.k. Traders, 29, Shopping Centre, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
Satya Prakash Maheshwari Son Of Shri Giriraj Sharan Gupta, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Navneet Kuti, Purohitji Ki Gali, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
----Respondent/Non-Applicant
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order
09/05/2024
This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the interim order dated 12.02.2020 passed by learned Rent Tribunal, Kota whereby, an application filed by the non-applicant/tenant under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC has been dismissed.
None for the petitioner even in second round.
In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
DIKSHA /37
Vinod Dubey
Satya Prakash Maheshwari
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
