Procedural order treating a writ petition as a miscellaneous application upon joint request of counsel and listing the matter for compliance with amended cause title filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3728/2000
Maszid Mumtaz Bag
----Petitioner
| Raj Wakf Tribunal And | Ors. | Versus ----Resp |
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mr. Ms. |
Z.A. Naqvi, Sr. Adv. with Sehban Naqvi Rabia Mateen |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mr. |
M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Adv. with Yashvardhan Tolani |
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
08/05/2024
On the joint request of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior Counsel for the private respondent, this writ petition is treated as SB Civil Miscellaneous Application in view of the order dated 07.08.2018 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in case of Deva Ram & Ors. versus Fakir Mohd. Qureshi & Ors.: DB Civil Writ No.599/2017 . Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file amended cause title within a period of two weeks failing which this petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
If compliance is made within time, list the matter on 27.05.2024.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/9
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Deva Ram & Ors. versus Fakir Mohd. Qureshi & Ors.Referred¶10
Deva Ram & Ors. versus Fakir Mohd. Qureshi & Ors.: DB Civil Writ No.599/2017
Maszid Mumtaz Bag
Raj Wakf Tribunal
Ors
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
