Dismissed

Amiri Lal Son of Shri Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jan 2024CW/486/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a pensioner for grievance redressal. Court disposed by granting liberty to approach respondents via representation in light of Div. Bench judgment in Ramesh Chander Gupta, directing consideration of claim and payment if due.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach respondents by filing representation for redressal based on cited judgment.

Amiri Lal Son of Shri Kishan Lal Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2287]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 486/2024

¶4

Amiri Lal Son Of Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of Gram Post Amoli, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

District Ayurvedic Officer, Bharatpur.

¶10

Deputy Director, Ayurvedic Department, Division Bharatpur.

¶11

Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.

¶12

Ayurvedic Officer, Rajkiya Ayurvedic Aushdhalaya, Jagjeevanpur, Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Katara For Respondent(s) :

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Judgment / Order

¶16

12/01/2024

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench in the case of “ Ramesh Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2800/2021 and other connected matters, decided on 17.10.2023.

¶18

(2 of 3) [CW-486/2024]

¶19

[2024:RJ-JP:2287]

¶20

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the respondents by way of filing a representation for redressal of his grievance in the light of judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

¶21

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5445/2022, decided on 07.08.2023 & the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

¶22

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶23

Ordered accordingly.

¶24

In the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the respondents shall consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and the observations made in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

[2024:RJ-JP:2287]

[CW-486/2024]

(3 of 3)

The order has been passed on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondents would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner be extended the relief as prayed, with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

¶29

The present writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.

¶30

Since the main petition has been disposed of, all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶31

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶32

ARTI SHARMA /73

Amiri Lal Son of Shri Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amiri Lal Son of Shri Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanwar Mal Yadav Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Hoshiyar Singh S/O Shri Ramji Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Shashikant Arya S/O Shri Bhag Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Yadav S/O Shri Kaluram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Prakash Sharma Son of Shri Subedar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan