A civil writ petition concerning a transport permit was dismissed as infructuous after respondents noted the petitioner's permit was valid only till 2019 and had lapsed by efflux of time. Pending applications including the stay application were also dismissed, with liberty to revive if grievance survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4665/2014
M/s Shree Ram Associate, G-1, Vastuka Apartment Plot No. 200, Gangasagar-B, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur through its Sole Proprietor Smt. Daulat W/o Brijendra Singh, aged about 47 years, R/o G-1, Vastuka Apartment Plot No. 200, Gangasagar-B, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kalwania-Addl.G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
22/04/2024
Counsel for the respondents submits that permit of the petitioner was valid till 2019, hence by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/148
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition remains relevant given the petitioner's permit expired in 2019?
M/s Shree Ram Associate (through Sole Proprietor Smt. Daulat)
State of Rajasthan (through Commissioner, Transport Department)
Regional Transport Authority, Sikar
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
