Bajrang Lal Kumawat v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged a transfer order. During pendency, an interim stay order was in place. This brief order converts the interim stay into an absolute stay, granting the respondents liberty to pass fresh orders if administrative exigency necessitates, without mandating the same.
What did the court decide?
Interim stay order on transfer made absolute with liberty to respondents to pass fresh orders if administrative exigency requires.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:5862]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 407/2021
Bajrang Lal Kumawat S/o Badri Prasad Kumawat, Aged About 43 Years, Near Surajkund, House Of Roop Singh Dasana, Village Majera, Post Kelwara, Tehsil Kumbhal Garh, District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department (Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rajsamand 3. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand
- Gram Panchayat Antari, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand Through The Sarpanch
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Vyas |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sunil Beniwal,AAG |
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim stay order on the petitioner's transfer should be continued or made absolute with liberty to pass fresh orders.
Whether the court should direct the respondents to pass fresh orders due to the duration of the interim protection.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bajrang Lal Kumawat
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rajsamand
- respondent
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh
- respondent
Gram Panchayat Antari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/407/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court