Disposed

Dr. Rajveer Singh Son of Shri Pritam Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 May 2024CW/4027/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of writ petitions challenging the calculation of backlog vacancies for SC, ST, and MBC in recruitment advertisements. The respondent-State filed schedules resolving the dispute for specific departments, leaving the lis settled for those cases while allowing remaining petitioners to file representations.

What did the court decide?

The petitions were disposed of as the grievance was resolved by the State's exercise; liberty granted to remaining aggrieved petitioners to file representations.

Dr. Rajveer Singh Son of Shri Pritam Singh Vs the… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:24780]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1777/2022

¶4

Dr. Hariom Meena S/o Sh. Ramdhan Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Post Khilchipur, Dist. Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan-322001. Department General Surgery.

¶5

Dr. Surendra Kumar S/o Sh. Sohan Lal Jiloya, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Post Sarwari, Dist. Sikar, Rajasthan3320309. Department Psychiatry

¶6

Dr. Rajeev Kumar Meena S/o Sh. Siyaram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jagjiwanpur, Dist.- Bhartpur-321408. Department Ent.

¶7

Dr. Brijmohan Meena S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Post Sinduki, Tehsil Mahuwa, Dist. Dausa-321608. Department Tb And Chest

¶8

Dr. Chandraprakash S/o Sh. Pratap Singh Chholak, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 43/44 Ambey Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur- 302012. Department Anaesthesia

¶9

Dr. Subhash Chand Meena S/o Sh. Harsahay Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Saray, Post-Gandal, TehsilBamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur-322204. Department General Medicine

¶10

Dr. Sanjay Meena S/o Sh. Ghansilal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ramgarh Pachwara, Tehsil Lalsot, Dist. Dausa, Rajasthan. Department Skin And V.d.

¶11

Dr. Ramkripal Meena S/o Sh. Ramphool Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dhahariya, The. Nadauti, Dist. Karauli Rajasthan. Department Radiotherapy.

¶12

Dr. Dhramendar Rawat S/o Sh. Shimbhu Dayal Rawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o A-715, Ward 36, Sanganer, Jaipur-302029. Department Pediatrics Medicine

¶13

Dr. Nitesh Meena S/o Sh. Shyojiram Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 779-A, Near Ahinsa Circle, Rk Puram Kota -324005. Department Obstetrics And Gynecology.

¶14

Dr. Manoj Meena S/o Sh. Hariram Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 658, Mahaveer Nagar 2Nd, Kota-324010. Department Orthopedics

¶15

Dr. Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Nandlal, Aged About 32 Years,

(2 of 5)

[2024:RJ-JP:24780]

[CW-1777/2022]

R/o Vill Soti, Post- Budana, Dist. Jhunjhunu- 332023. Department P And Sm

¶20

Dr. Suneeta Kuldeep D/o Sh. Kanhaiyalal Kuldeep, Aged About 39 Years, R/o A-18, Shyam Mitramandal Nagar, Muralipura, Jaipur-302039. Department Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation.

¶21

Dr. Priyanka Indoriya D/o Sh. Ramswroop Indoria, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 4/372, Near Garg Flour Mill, Raj Nagar Colony Sawai Madhopur- 322001. Department Ophthalamology

¶22

----Petitioners

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Represented Through Principal Secretary, Medical (College Education), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶25

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Represented Through Its Secretary, Office Of The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

Connected With

¶28

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4027/2022

¶29

Dr. Rajveer Singh Son Of Shri Pritam Singh, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Bedham, Bharatpura-321203 (Raj.).

¶30

----Petitioner

¶31

Versus

¶32

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶33

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶34

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary.

¶35

----Respondents

¶36

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5305/2022

¶37

Dr. Rajmal Meena S/o Sh. Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Piplya Choki, Post - Makhampura, Teh - Chhipa -

(3 of 5)

[2024:RJ-JP:24780]

[CW-1777/2022]

Barod, Dist Baran, Rajasthan.

¶42

----Petitioner

¶43

Versus

¶44

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005

¶45

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Chairman, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001

¶46

Department Of Medical Education, Through Commissioner, Directorate Of Medical Education, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Govind Marg, Jaipur-302004.

¶47

----Respondents

¶48

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.	Shovit Jhajharia Anurag Mathur with Bhavana Ladha for Santanu Sharma Himanshu Kala Movil Jeenwal Rajat for Ajatshatru Mina
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms.	Rajendra Prasad, AG with Darsh Pareek R. K. Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Aditya Kiran Mathur Raghav Sharma for Samit Bishnoi Vinod Kumar Sain for Jainendra Kumar Jain Yuvraj Samant with Neha Amola

¶49

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶50

Order

¶51

24/05/2024

¶52

In the instant bunch of petitions, it is submitted that the respondent-RPSC had issued an advertisement dated 27.11.2021 for recruitment on 337 posts in 43 specialties.

[2024:RJ-JP:24780]

[CW-1777/2022]

(4 of 5)

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that while counting the vacancies for direct recruitment on the post of Assistant Professor in different Departments, position as on 01.04.2020 was taken and thereafter, requisition was sent to the Commission.

¶57

A dispute has been raised by the petitioners claiming the filling up of the backlog vacancies for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and calculation of MBC in respect of 14 Departments/subjects notified in the advertisement dated 27.11.2021. It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that no dispute has been raised with regard to the vacancies of SC and ST categories, in respect of the Departments other than the 14 specified in the list in question. The submission showing number of departments with the vacancies notified vis a vis , the claim made in the writ petition is already on record.

¶58

When the matter was argued, learned Advocate General, under instructions from the respective Department, submitted that to resolve the dispute, an in-house exercise was carried out and after considering the matter vide Schedule-A and Schedule-B, qua the 14 departments backlog was calculated. As per Schedule-A, it was reflected that no backlog as on date exists and whatever was advertised holds the field. Qua Schedule-B which was filed by way of additional submissions, it was submitted that modified requirements will be duly sent to the RPSC qua the backlog which is admitted on part of the respondent-State. Learned Advocate General has submitted that in the light of the above, in petition No. 1777/2022 and 5305/2022, the lis in question will be settled and nothing will survive, with the exception for the other 9

[2024:RJ-JP:24780]

[CW-1777/2022]

(5 of 5)

petitioners in SBCWP No. 1777/2022 and SBCWP No. 4027/2022. It is submitted that other than the above-said 9 petitioners, petitioners can file their representation within a period of 7 days. It is further submitted that if aggrieved petitioners will file a representation within a period of 7 days from today before the Additional Chief Secretary (Medical and Health), then the same will be considered by way of speaking order after grant of personal hearing to them within a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶63

In light of the exercise undertaken by respondents as per Schedule-B and the modification qua the backlog as calculated, it is spelled by this Court that the grievance in question no more longer exists.

¶64

In light of the above said submissions, present petitions are disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶65

It is made clear that respondents shall carry out the selection procedure in light of the above said submissions. Liberty is given to the petitioners, who are filing representations, that if their dispute is not resolved, they can approach this court again in the future, in accordance with law.

¶66

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶67

Pooja /276-278

Dr. Rajveer Singh Son of Shri Pritam Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Rajveer Singh Son of Shri Pritam Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Secretary Administration Rrvpnl Vs Kunj Bihari Sharma S/O Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma

Bhanwar Lal Jat Vs Rajasthan Agriculture Univesit

Ravindra Kumar Yadav Vs Recruitment Officer and Anr.

Lokesh Kumar (Ct/Dvr No. 150706063) Son of Shri Surta Ram Vs the Union of India

Dr. Hariom Meena S/O Sh. Ramdhan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar Saxena Son of Shri Kamta Prasad Saxena Vs State of Rajasthan