Petitioner sought appointment-related relief against State respondents. The court was informed that the petitioner had already been granted the appointment, making the matter infructuous; the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50271]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2960/2019
Shambu Lal Regar S/o Shri Mangi Lal Regar, Aged About 34 Years, Category-SC Male/LD/CP, R/o - Village Post Selaguda, Tehsil Amet, Distt. Rajsamand.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Gouttam For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
06/12/2024
Learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted that appointment has already been granted to the petitioner, therefore, the instant matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/61
Shambu Lal Regar
State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department
Chief Executive Officer-Cum-Member Secretary, Zila Parishad, Rajsamand
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
