The High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur bench, dismissed two connected writ petitions as infructuous at the instance of the petitioners counsel, without granting any specific relief. The orders was disposed off citing statements made by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:1165]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 543/2010
Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/o Om Prakash Gupta, age about 42 years, 61/470, Heerapath, Mansrover, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 245/2010
Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/o Om Prakash Gupta age about 42 years, R/o 61/470, Heerapath, Mansrover, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni, AAG with Mr. S.M. Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
08/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petitions have become infructuous.
[2024:RJ-JP:1165]
[CW-543/2010]
(2 of 2)
In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Satyendra/165-166
Dinesh Kumar Gupta
State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education
Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
