Allowed

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/O Shri Jagan Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Jan 2024CW/475/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions seeking service benefits were disposed of in light of a co-ordinate bench decision in Jorawar Singh. The court directed respondents to allow service benefits and consequential benefits, including selection scale, to petitioners based on their date of initial appointment.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to allow service benefits and consequential benefits including selection scale to petitioners based on date of initial appointment.

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/O Shri Jagan Ram Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:852]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 475/2023

¶4

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/o Shri Jagan Ram, Aged About 54 Years, Presently Residing At Jonaycha Kalan, Alwar, Rajasthan-301706.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Alwar.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 544/2023

¶11

Virendra Singh Yadav S/o Shri Hajari Lal, Aged About 49 Years, Presently Residing At Dhis, Bhagwari Kalan, Alwar, Rajasthan - 301713. (Presently Posted On The Post Of Senior Teacher (Varishta Adhyapak) At Government Senior Secondary School, Jakhrana, Behror, District Alwar.)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶15

The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Alwar.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 545/2023

¶18

Jaiprakash Yadav S/o Shri Jaisingh Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, Presently Residing At Gandala, Alwar, Rajasthan - 301709. (Presently Posted On The Post Of Senior Teacher (Varishta Adhyapak) At Government Senior Secondary School, Jonayacha Kalan Neemrana, Alwar)

¶19

----Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶22

The District Education Officer, Primary Education,

¶23

[2024:RJ-JP:852] (2 of 3) [CW-475/2023]
Alwar.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 546/2023
Kanwar Singh Yadav S/o Shri Ramanand Yadav, Aged About
53 Years, Presently Residing At House No. 151, Khohri,
Alwar, Rajasthan - 301713.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department
Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Education Officer, Primary Education,
Alwar.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 512/2023
Anil Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Udai Chand Yadav, Aged About
51 Years, Presently Residing At Gandala, Alwar, Rajasthan
- 301709.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department
Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Education Officer, Primary Education,
Alwar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav with
Mr. Niraj Kumar Yadav
For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.L. Saini, AAG

¶24

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Judgment / Order

05/01/2024

[2024:RJ-JP:852]

[CW-475/2023]

(3 of 3)

Mr. C.L. Saini, AAG puts in appearance on behalf of both the respondents. Hence, service upon all the respondents is complete. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Jorawar Singh

¶31

Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

¶32

555/2005) , decided on 07.11.2006.

¶33

Counsel for the respondent-State admits that yes, the issue raised in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the order passed in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) and these petitions may also be disposed in same terms and directions as given in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) .

¶34

Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed off with the directions to the respondents to allow the service benefits to the petitioners by considering the date of initial appointment in the Government service and the petitioners would be entitled for consequential benefits, including the selection scale etc.

¶35

Since the main petitions have been disposed of, all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed.

¶36

Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in each connected files.

¶37

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶38

DIVYA SAINI /42-45, 64

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/O Shri Jagan Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/O Shri Jagan Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Angela Jacub Vs State of Raj Andors

Daya Chand Sharma Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Manoj Kumar Jatav S/O Shri Dinesh Chand Jatav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ashutosh Choudhary S/O. Rajaram Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jaiprakash Yadav S/O Shri Jaisingh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Virendra Singh Yadav S/O Shri Hajari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan