Dismissed

Narendra Kumar Malav S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2024CW/155/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a writ petition by relying on a prior judgment. The Court directed the State to organize and consider specific representations properly, adhere to Rule 19 of the 1965 Rules, upload decisions on the website, and decide within the framework of the cited precedent without entering the merits of the controversy.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed in light of the prior order passed on 16.11.2023 in Rajendra Kumar Beniwal case, subject to directions for proper consideration of representations.

Narendra Kumar Malav S/O Chhitar Lal Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:992]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 155/2024

¶4

Narendra Kumar Malav S/o Chhitar Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Main Road Hanvat Kheda Hanuwat Khera Bara Rajasthan

¶5

Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shiv Charan Sharma, R/o Purani Nakoda Colony Oil Factory Bara Rajasthan

¶6

Mukesh Sharma S/o Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, R/o Chhaga Ki Nangal Sikar Rajasthan

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶10

Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur Through Its Director.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Pradeep Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, AAG

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

¶14

08/01/2024

¶15

Learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the order passed this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar

¶16

Beniwal Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ

¶17

Petition No.14080/2023) decided on 16.11.2023 along with other connected matters.

¶18

In light of such submissions, the present petition is disposed of in light of the case of Rajendra Kumar Beniwal (supra) with the following directions:-

¶19

“A. All the representations shall be properly organized by the State to have a proper and elaborate consideration of the same.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:992]

[CW-155/2024]

B. In case any of the petitioner has failed to file the representation, it shall be open for the petitioner who has filed the writ petition upto 16.11.2023, by the advertisement for the recruitment of Nursing and Paramedical Officers etc. may file such representation within a period of 20 days from today along with certified /web copy of this order.

¶24

C. Such representations shall be considered by the State while keeping into consideration the policy decision taken by the State on 03.11.2023 and the deliberations regarding the issues in question.

¶25

D. The State shall be required to take a considered stand on each of the broader controversy before publishing the final select list, after considering the grievance raised in such representations.

¶26

E. It shall be open for the petitioners to approach this Court again after the State has applied its mind on the representations and passed appropriate speaking orders strictly in accordance with law.

¶27

F. The State shall strictly adhere to the Rule 19 of the Rules of1965 while deciding all these representations.

¶28

G. The decision taken by the State shall be uploaded on the website.

¶29

H. In case any issue beyond the policy decision dated 03.11.2023 also remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file representations within a period of 20 days from today alongwith certified/web copy of this order, which shall also be considered appropriately by the respondent-State.

¶30

I. In case the matters come back to this Court, it shall be open for the both parties to raise all their issues as this Court has not entered into the merits of the controversy while passing today’s order.”

¶31

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶32

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶33

Satyendra/53

Narendra Kumar Malav S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Kumar Malav S/O Chhitar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Choudhary S/O. Rajaram Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Tejpal Singh Dhanka S/O Shri Jagan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaiprakash Yadav S/O Shri Jaisingh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Sudesh Kumar S/O Shri Jagmal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat Lal S/O Shri Surja Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar Gupta Vs Secretary R P S C and Ors.