Disposed
Hadman Ram v. Dharmaram
Rajasthan HCCW/2268/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This one-line order directs the Board of Revenue to decide a pending revision within six months and maintains the status quo on the disputed property.
What did the court decide?
Order the Board of Revenue to decide the pending revision within six months and direct parties to maintain status quo on disputed property.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:10430]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2268/2024
¶4
Hadman Ram S/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Adwad (Ratanga), Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶5
----Petitioner
¶6
Versus
¶7
- Dharmaram S/o Punaram, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶8
- Kaluram @ Kanwarjeet S/o Ramnarayan, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶9
- Vikram S/o Ramnarayan, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶10
- Mahendra S/o Ramnarayan, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶11
- Ramnarayan S/o Punaram, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
¶12
- Bastiram S/o Punaram, R/o Adwad, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Hadman Ram
- respondent
Dharmaram
- respondent
Kaluram
- respondent
Vikram
- respondent
Mahendra
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2268/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court