Sangeeta Jain v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged removal from urgent temporary government appointment without justification. Court found no interim protection was granted and the post is no longer available. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as rendered infructous due to unavailability of the post and lack of interim protection.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1940/2007
Sangeeta Jain W/o Shri Vikas Kumar Jain and D/o Sh. Mahaveer Prasad Jain, aged 27 years, R/o Plot No. 40 Mahaveer Nagar, Sawai Madhopur
----Petitioner
Versus
- State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Vikas Alaria : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
04/12/2024
Learned counsel has submitted that in pursuance to the advertisement dated 04.08.2003 the petitioner was given appointment qua the vacant posts on an urgent temporary basis in consideration of a fixed remuneration.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging removal from temporary government employment is maintainable as the post is no longer available.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sangeeta Jain
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Director, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/1940/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court