In this writ petition concerning pension matters, Justice Arun Monga disposed of the petition by directing the respondent authority to decide the petitioner’s representation as expeditiously as possible, guided by the observations in Vijay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.
The petitioner's pending representation be decided as expeditiously as possible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:7143]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1884/2024
Chintaman Das Soni S/o Leeladhar Soni, Aged About 64 Years, Major Veer Singh Marg, Sardarpura, Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. KuldeepVaishnav |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : ---- |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
12/02/2024
(2 of 2) [CW-1884/2024]
[2024:RJ-JD:7143]
representations of the petitioner in accordance with law after going through the observations made in the case of Vijay Singh (supra), as expeditiously as possible.
(ARUN MONGA),J
40-DhananjayS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending petitioner representation should be reconsidered in light of the judgment in Vijay Singh case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Singh Vs. State of RajasthanExplained¶17
Vijay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21/2020)
Chintaman Das Soni
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
