Petitioner challenged pension-related decisions. Court, after counsel consensus that matter was decided in identical coordinates, disposed of petition in same terms as earlier judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:6840]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1168/2024
Govind Ram S/o Shri Jethu Ram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Ward No 13, Near Badla Wala Balaji, Vpo Parbatsar, District DidwanaKuchaman, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Pidiyar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hemant Choudhary, G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order 09/02/2024
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that similar controversy has already been decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur in the case of Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21/2020 , decided on 21.07.2023.
In view of the aforesaid consensus between learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is also disposed of in same terms as judgment ibid .
(ARUN MONGA),J
21-Sumit/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶18
Vijay Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21/2020
Govind Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
