Petitioners challenge delay in pension settlement. Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the respondents informed that the petitioners' reliefs had already been granted and Pension Payment Orders issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:17534]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1631/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CW-1631/2021]
[2024:RJ-JD:17534]
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jitendra Mohan Choudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit,Dy.S.G. |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
23/04/2024
(DINESH MEHTA),J
2-akansha/-
Buddha Ram Choudhary
Gopal Ram Vishnoi
Man Singh
Mohd. Ayub Khan
Union Of India
Officer In Charge, Record Office, Corps Of Eme, Trimulgherry
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
