This bail application was allowed. The High Court held that the applicants cannot be incarcerated indefinitely as the trial would take substantial time, despite the charge of setting fire to a house. They were released on personal bond and sureties.
Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:17697]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 2024/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Matoria For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K.Bhati, PP
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
23/04/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JD:17697]
[CRLMB-2024/2024]
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JD:17697]
[CRLMB-2024/2024]
furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 9. Applicants shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
440-akansha/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants charged with offences under IPC Sections 143, 452, 379, 436, and 427 should be granted bail.
Whether the length of trial and lack of proof of robbery warrant release on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nanku S/o Kamji
Ramesh S/o Kamji
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
