Bail application by an accused in judicial custody was not pressed by the learned counsel representing the applicant. The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the bail application as it was not pressed.
Bail application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:17444]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 453/2024
Munna Ram S/o Shaitan Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ashop, Police Station Asop, District Jodhpur (Raj) (In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. J.S. Choudhary Sr. Counsel |
|---|---|
| assisted byMr. PradeepChoudhary | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor |
| Dr. R.K. Kumawat, Assistant Director, | |
| FSL(DNA) present inperson. |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
22/04/2024
(DINESH MEHTA),J
179-Mak/-
Munna Ram S/o Shaitan Ram
State Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
