The petitioner challenged his suspension and the pending disciplinary enquiry. The respondent Nigam subsequently reinstated the petitioner during the pendency of the petition. The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, reserving the question of the departmental enquiry for future consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:6865]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1415/2024
Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Dharma Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5, Chak 25 K.y.d., Khajuwala, 24-25 K.y.d., Bikaner (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
09/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:6865]
[CW-1415/2024]
(2 of 2)
reinstated the petitioner due to which the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
7-akansha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging suspension and disciplinary enquiry is rendered infructuous due to reinstatement.
Ramesh Kumar
The Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited
The Secretary (Administration), Jdvvnl
The Superintending Engineer, Jdvvnl
The Executive Engineer, Jdvvnl (O And M)
The Executive Engineer, Jodhpur Discom
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
