Petitioner challenged non-revocation of his suspension unlike a colleague. Court disposed of petition directing respondent to consider specific representation within four weeks, ensuring expeditious redressal.
Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 26.10.2023 within four weeks and file fresh representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:6509]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 466/2024
Rakesh Kumar Yadav S/o Ram Singh Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, (Emp Id 5128451) R/o Ward No. 03, Birbal Vihar Colony, Pilibangan, District Hanumangarh, (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Khosa For Respondent(s) : -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
08/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:6509]
[CW-466/2024]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
6-akansha/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether suspension of petitioner can be equated with that of similarly situated employee whose suspension was revoked.
Whether representation of petitioner dated 26.10.2023 should be considered by respondents.
Rakesh Kumar Yadav
Punjab National Bank
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
