Sushil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an order making him an Agency Post Officer (APO) without reasons. While an interim stay was in place, the Court made the interim order absolute but clarified that this liberty does not mandate future fresh orders if not administratively required.
What did the court decide?
Interim stay order is made absolute; liberty to pass fresh orders granted only if administrative exigency arises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:5933]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11742/2022
Sushil Kumar S/o Babu Lal Vishnoi, Aged About 30 Years, Jaroda Kalan, District Nagaur (Raj.) At Present Posted As Gram Vikas Adhikari At Gram Panchayat Merta Road, Panchayat Samiti Merta, District Nagaur
----Petitioner
- Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
- Addl. Commissionser And Joint Administration Secretary (First), Ruler Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
- The Addl. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Nagaur (Raj.)
- Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Merta, District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to make the interim stay on the transfer of the petitioner absolute.
Whether to impose a direction on respondents to pass fresh transfer orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sushil Kumar S/o Babu Lal Vishnoi
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Arun Monga
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/11742/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court