Dismissed

Kajodi Devi Wife of Narendra Alias Pappu Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Mar 2024CRLW/107/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions for protection of life and liberty, citing an FIR under Sections 302 and 34 IPC and alleged pressure to compromise. Counsel did not press the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh representation if needed. The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed with that liberty; pending applications disposed of.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kajodi Devi Wife of Narendra Alias Pappu Lal… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:11833]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 107/2024

¶4

Kajodi Devi Wife Of Narendra Alias Pappu Lal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Suraj Ka Kheda, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶5

Banti S/o Narendra Alias Pappu Lal, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Suraj Ka Kheda, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Inspector General Of Police, Tonk.

¶10

The Superintendent Of Police, Tonk, Raj.

¶11

The Station House Officer, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶12

Chainsukh Son Of Shri Ramsahay, Resident Of Suraj Ka Kheda, Nawai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶13

Brijmohan Son Of Shri Ramsahay, Resident Of Suraj Ka Kheda, Nawai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶14

Kailash Son Of Shri Kanaram, Resident Of Suraj Ka Kheda, Nawai Sadar, District Tonk.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Susheel Pujari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶18

Order

¶19

07/03/2024

¶20

Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking directions for providing security of their life and liberty on the basis of one FIR No.79/2023 lodged by petitioners for offences under Sections 302

¶21

& 34 of IPC and thereafter, relatives of petitioners lodged a

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:11833]

[CRLW-107/2024]

complaint on 30.04.2023 that the accused party is exerting pressure upon petitioners to enter into compromise.

¶26

After arguing for some time, counsel for petitioners does not want to press the instant writ petition with liberty to submit a fresh representation, if need so arises.

¶27

In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not press with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

Stay application or other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶29

(SUDESH BANSAL), J

¶30

RONAK/1

Kajodi Devi Wife of Narendra Alias Pappu Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kajodi Devi Wife of Narendra Alias Pappu Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Kamlesh Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Babulal Bagda, Vs Shri Ratan Lal Son of Shri Bhairuram

Smt Vijayrani and Ors. Vs State

Aditya @ Bhupendre @ Guddu Son of Mr. Gyan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Tusiya @ Paramanand S/O Laalchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Son of Fazru Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshani Daughter of Shri Kallu Ram, Wife of Shri Buddhi Prakash, Vs State of Rajasthan