Gordhan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 93/2006, the Rajasthan High Court reduced the sentence of the accused from six months to the period already undergone, maintaining the conviction for the offence under Section 19 of the Rajasthan Excise Act.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period undergone; conviction maintained; bail bonds discharged; record returned to trial court.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:50921]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 93/2006
Gordhan S/o Ramswaroop @ Ramchandra, R/o Googdod, PS Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Accused in Subjail Gangapur City)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amrit Kumar Surollia Mr. Aditya Surollia Mr. Ashish Surollia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
11/12/2024
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence of six months simple imprisonment and fine awarded to the accused for the offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act warrants reduction given the pendency of the revi
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gordhan S/o Ramswaroop @ Ramchandra
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Ganesh Ram Meena
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/93/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court