The petitioner challenged the framing of charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC. The Court held that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case needs to be established and meticulous examination of evidence is not required. The revision petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 677/2018
Rameshwar Prasad Mina S/o Shri Hari Narayan Mina R/o Plot No.2, Shyam Bihar Colony, Near Pannadhai Circle, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Cbi Through PP, RHC, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP Mr. Sanjeev Singhal for Mr. Jag Mohan Saxena for CBI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
03/04/2024
[CRLR-677/2018]
(2 of 3)
[CRLR-677/2018]
(3 of 3)
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma/44
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court correctly framed charges against the petitioner under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC?
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order framing charges at the revision stage?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rameshwar Prasad Mina
State Cbi Through PP, RHC, Jaipur
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
