A husband challenged a Family Court order awarding his wife Rs.3,000 monthly maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Citing Supreme Court precedent on maintenance as social justice, the High Court found no error in the order and dismissed the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 25/2018
Lalit @ Banti S/o Shri Hemraj, R/o Village Dhakarkherli, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Lalita Kushwaha W/o Shri Lalit @ Banti, D/o Shri Rambharos Ji, R/o Sanjay Gandhi School Ke Pas, Nahar Ke Pulia Ke Pas, Borkheda, Kota, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
17/05/2024
(2 of 2) [CRLR-25/2018]
matrimonial home without any justified reason, hence, under these circumstances, she is not entitled to get any sort of maintenance.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order granting the wife Rs.3,000 per month maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. warranted interference by revision.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit And AnotherRelied on¶4
AIR 1999 SC 3348 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalit @ Banti
Lalita Kushwaha
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
