Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging the framing of charges. The Special Judge framed charges under Sections 376 and 377 IPC based on prima facie evidence. The High Court held no interference warranted.
Instant revision petition and stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:23188]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 736/2019
Arbab Khan @ Shanu S/o Amanatullah Khan, R/o Mali Mohalla Main Road Chand Khedi Thana Khanpur Dist. Jhalawar Raj.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjum Parveen for Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
16/05/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:23188]
[CRLR-736/2019]
evidence of the prosecution witnesses is not required to be meticulously examined or analyzed at the stage of framing of the charges that would be done, at the appropriate stage by the Trial Court. The order of framing of the charge passed by the Trial Court is just and proper which requires no interference of this Court.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Garima /35
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Special Court erred in framing charges against the accused at the prima facie stage.
Whether the revision petition challenging the framing of charges deserves interference.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Arbab Khan @ Shanu
State Of Rajasthan
Afsana Begum
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
