Accused-petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR. Counsel withdrew the petition on merits as it became infructuous. The court dismissed it accordingly.
Petition dismissed. Stay application and other pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:13489]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 98/2023
Sudheer Kumar Advocate S/o Ilam Chand, Chamber No. 652 Patiala House Court New Delhi 110001.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
18/03/2024
(SUDESH BANSAL), J
TN/1118
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudheer Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Babulal Saini
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
