A criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as no one appeared for the petitioner in two rounds of listing; the court dismissed it for want of prosecution without addressing the petition's substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:202]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 870/2021
Akbar S/o Sh. Majid, R/o Gram Khoharikalan, Police Thana Tapukada District Alwar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yeshwant Kankhadia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
02/01/2024
None present for the petitioner even in the second round.
Thus, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
220-nirmala
Akbar S/o Sh. Majid, R/o Gram Khoharikalan, Police Thana Tapukada District Alwar (Raj.)
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
