The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition due to the non-appearance of the petitioners even in the second round, resulting in dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:201]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 586/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yeshwant Kankhadia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
02/01/2024
None present for the petitioners even in the second round.
Thus, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
217-nirmala
Kamla Devi
Jagdish Prasad Banjara Bhat
State Of Rajasthan
Superintendent Of Police, District Jhunjhunu
S.h.o., Police Station Sadar Jhunjhunu
Investigation Officer, Police Station Sadar Jhunjhunu
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
