Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared for the petitioner in two rounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:198]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 220/2021
Radhamohan Dhakad S/o Hukum Dhakad, R/o 30, Shrinath Colony, Khokhabhas, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yeshwant Kankhadia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
02/01/2024
None present for the petitioner even in the second round.
Thus, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
214-Nirmala
Radhamohan Dhakad
State of Rajasthan
Police Commissioner, Commissionerate of Police, Jaipur
S.H.O. Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
