The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners in the second round to argue the case.
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:23618]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 832/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP
: Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order
16/05/2024
No one has put in appearance even in second round on behalf of the petitioners to argue the case.
Perhaps the petitioners have lost interest in this petition.
Consequently, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
DEEPA RANI -64
Dulichand S/o Manguram
Kamla Devi W/o Dulichand
Rajendra S/o Dulichand
Jitendra Kumar S/o Dulichand
Anita Devi W/o Rajendra
Garima Devi D/o Dulichand
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
