Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared in two rounds; the court noted apparent loss of interest in pursuing the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1411/2024
Girraj Prasad Gupta S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Gupta, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 62A, Jai Karni Nagar, Old 34 Bus Stand, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP Mr. Anurag Pareek, for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
15/05/2024
No one is present even in second round to argue the case of the petitioner. Perhaps, the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing the bail application.
Accordingly, this miscellaneous bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /81
Girraj Prasad Gupta
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
