Allowed

Tej Singh @ Teji S/O Ram Khiladi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Oct 2024CRLMP/6451/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC and quashed FIR No. 282/2020 registered at PS Weir, Bharatpur, for offences under IPC Sections 143, 498-A, 406, 323, and 341, noting that the parties had amicably settled the inter-se dispute without coercion.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 282/2020 at PS Weir, District Bharatpur, and all consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside.

Tej Singh @ Teji S/O Ram Khiladi Vs State of Rajasthan — Domestic Violence | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:43576]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6451/2020

¶4

Tej Singh @ Teji S/o Ram Khiladi, R/o Guthakar, Police Station Weir, Distt. Bharatpur Raj. Presently R/o J.D.A. Colony, C-515, Paldi Meena, Jaipur Raj.

¶5

Bhagwan Singh S/o Ram Khiladi, R/o Guthakar, Police Station Weir, Distt. Bharatpur Raj. Presently R/o J.D.A. Colony, C-515, Paldi Meena, Jaipur Raj.

¶6

Bhagmati W/o Ram Khiladi, R/o Guthakar, Police Station Weir, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.

¶7

Supita D/o Ram Khiladi W/o Vishnu, R/o Village Guthakar, Police Station Weir, Distt. Bharatpur Raj. Presently R/o Village Mehmadpura, Tehsil Bayana Distt. Bharatpur Raj.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶11

Machhala Devi W/o Tej Singh, R/o Guthakar, Police Station Weir, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R S Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Balvendra Singh

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶15

Order

¶16

17/10/2024

¶17

This petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is filed with a prayer to quash the FIR No.282/2020 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143, 498-A, 406, 323, 341 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:43576]

[CRLMP-6451/2020]

Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the parties without any coercion or influence have entered into a compromise. Hence, both the parties have jointly agreed for quashing the impugned FIR and any further proceedings, arising therefrom. It is further submitted that an application is filed for bringing the compromise on record.

¶22

Heard and considered.

¶23

At this juncture, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the dictum of the Hon’ble Apex Court enunciated in Jasmair Singh Vs. State of Haryana [(2022) 9 SCC 73] and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] , wherein, it was held that a case was eminently suitable to be considered for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of criminal proceedings, if the parties have buried the hatchet and decided to give quietus to the proceedings, which were lodged inter se against one another.

¶24

In view of the said legal position, laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned cases, and considering the fact that the dispute deals in personam and has amicably been settled between/by the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the present misc. Petition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated therein, the application (IA No. 1/2024) for taking compromise on record is allowed.

¶25

Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 282/2020 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur with all consequential proceedings, is hereby quashed and set aside.

¶26

[2024:RJ-JP:43576] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6451/2020]

¶27

Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶28

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶29

DEEPAK/232

Tej Singh @ Teji S/O Ram Khiladi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tej Singh @ Teji S/O Ram Khiladi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhaiya Lal Vs State

Rajmal Vs State

Afsar @ Adha Kilo S/O Asfak Vs State of Rajasthan

Biyo Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajkumar S/O Late Shri Kesriya, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bahadur Singh Gurjar S/O Shri Dholuram Gurjar, Vs State of Rajasthan