Kanhaiya Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 891/2006, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition as infructuous following the death of the petitioner during the pendency of the proceedings.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:43425]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 891/2006
Kanhaiya Lal son of Roduram, Resident of Village Bhojwada, Tehsil Baswa District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Raj. Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
16/10/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a factual report, which is taken on record, wherein it is reflected that petitioner had died during the currency of the petition. Therefore, present petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kanhaiya Lal son of Roduram
- respondent
State of Raj. Through PP
Coram
SAMEER JAIN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/891/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court