Rajmal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition as infructuous on the basis of a factual report submitted by the Public Prosecutor indicating that the petitioner had died during the currency of the petition.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JP:43426]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1124/2006
Rajmal S/o Ram Chandra, R/o Gram Tirath, P.S. K. Patan, District Bundi (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Raj. Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
16/10/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a factual report, which is taken on record, wherein it is reflected that petitioner had died during the currency of the petition. Therefore, present petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajmal S/o Ram Chandra
- respondent
State of Raj.
Coram
Sameer Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1124/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court