Petitioners submitted the criminal miscellaneous petition had become infructuous due to subsequent events; nothing remained for adjudication, and the court dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:19012]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 272/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Trilok Joshi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP |
| Mr. Prakash Panwar,AGA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
02/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to the subsequent events, the present misc. petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon in the present misc. petition.
Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( KULDEEP MATHUR),J
140-himanshu/-
Sandeep Kumar Meel
Jugal Siyag
Shrawan Meel
Aman Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Pawan Sharma
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
