This court dismissed a bail application as it was not pressed by the petitioner, granting leave to file a fresh application after the seizure officer's statements are recorded by the trial court.
Leave granted to file a fresh bail application after recording of seizure officer's statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:18811]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 408/2024
Banshi Lal S/o Kashiram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Timriya, P.s. Ratangarh, Dist. Neemuch (Mp) (At Present Lodged At Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Charan |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. A.R. Choudhary,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage but, he craves leave of the Court to file a fresh bail application after the statements of the seizure officer are recorded.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty prayed for. It is expected from the trial court that the statements of the seizure officer will be recorded on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
62-mohit/-
Banshi Lal S/o Kashiram
State Of Rajasthan
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
