The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the rejection of a private complaint via FIR and acceptance of a negative final report. The Court held the petition was barred under Section 397(3) CrPC as it constituted a second revision disguised as a Section 482 application.
The criminal miscellaneous petition and the stay petition were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:22085]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 175/2012
Bimlabai W/o Shri Rasham Singh, R/o Patroda, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
R/o Chak 2 K.N.D. Tehsil Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Thind For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
15/05/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:22085]
[CRLMP-175/2012]
(2 of 3)
the Final Report No.25/2009 pertaining to FIR No.26/2009 registered at the Police Station Anoopgarh.
[2024:RJ-JD:22085]
[CRLMP-175/2012]
(3 of 3)
(FARJAND ALI),J
654-Pramod/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to assail the order accepting a negative final report and dismissing a protest is barred as a second revision under Section 397(3
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bimlabai W/o Shri Rasham Singh
The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
Sukhdev Singh S/o Shri Gurbachan Singh
Sukhdev Singh's wife name not known
Kalu Singh S/o Shri Gurbachan Singh
Rama S/o Shri Gurbachan Singh
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
