Petitioners' criminal miscellaneous petition was withdrawn by counsel, who sought liberty to submit a representation to the competent authority. The court dismissed the petition and stay application as not pressed but permitted the petitioners to file a representation with documents before the Investigating Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:21867]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1508/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. L.K. Ramdhari. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
15/05/2024
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not want to press the instant criminal misc. petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the competent authority.
In view of the above submission, the misc. petition petition as well as stay application are dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners are permitted to submit a representation alongwith the relevant documents before the Investigating Officer and the
[2024:RJ-JD:21867]
[CRLMP-1508/2024]
(2 of 2)
Investigating Officer is directed to consider the documents in an objective manner before forming any opinion.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
195-Tikam/-
Achlaram
Sukh Ram
Sona Ram
Dharma Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Singh
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
