Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an application before the trial Court for medical examination of Mitthu Singh in respect of injuries sustained by injured on his body and the trial Court vide order dated 03.12.2021 allowed the application filed by the petitioner and directed the In-charge, Medical College Bharatpur to constitute a medical board for examination and submit a report in respect of injuries sustained by injured Mittu Singh on his body. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that respondent No. 2-Mitthu Singh preferred a revision petition against the order dated 03.12.2021 passed by the trial Court and the revisional Court vide its order dated 20.12.2021 allowed the revision petition filed by respondent No. 2-Mitthu Singh and set aside the order dated 03.12.2021 passed by the trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per medical report, Mitthu Singh received injuries by sharp edged weapon on his head, whereas he had not received any injury on his body by sharp edged weapon. His medical report was prepared after 22 days of the incident. So, the said medical report was not genuine. So, trial Court rightly directed the Incharge, Medical College Bharatpur to constitute a medical board for examination and submit a report in respect of injuries sustained by injured Mitthu Singh on his body but revisional court has committed an error in allowing the revision petition filed by respondent No.2 and wrongly set aside the order 03.12.2021 passed by the trial Court.
