The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the bail application of the petitioner, noting his history of violating bail conditions and creating confusion for the prosecutor, rendering further detention necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:36704]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9783/2024
Bablu Meena @ Laxmichand S/o Sukhlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Inayati, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.S. Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ra
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
02/09/2024
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk uknkSrh] ftyk&xaxkiqj flVh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 157@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuki= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k ds lgvfHk;qDr cyohj flag ds vkf/kiR; ls 5 xzke 50 feyhxzke LeSd cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds vkf/kiR; ls dksbZ eknd inkFkZ cjken ugha gqvk gS rFkk ml ij /kkjk 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e dk vfHk;ksx gSA og fnukad 8-7-2024 ls fujUrj vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds vUos"k.k ,oa vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd ekeys ds lgvfHk;qDr cyohj flag us izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls LeSd [kjhnuk crk;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ds 5 vkijkf/kd izdj.k yfEcr gS] ftuesa ls nks izdj.k
[2024:RJ-JP:36704]
[CRLMB-9783/2024]
(2 of 2)
8@21] 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] nks izdj.k pksjh ds rFkk ,d izdj.k ekjihV ds vijk/k ls lEcfU/kr gSA vfHk;qDr ,d vknru vijk/kh gS vkSj mlus tekur dh lqfo/kk dk nq:i;ksx fd;k gSA vr% leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ;g vk{ksi gS fd mlus lgvfHk;qDr cyohj flag dks eknd inkFkZ LeSd csph FkhA mlds fo:) iwoZ esa Hkh ikap vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gksuk ik;s x;s gS] ftuesa ls nks izdj.k /kkjk 8@21] 8@29 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ls lEcfU/kr gS] nks izdj.k 379 Hkk-n-la- o 4@21 ,e-,evkj-Mh- ,DV ls lEcfU/kr rFkk ,d izdj.k /kkjk 325 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ls lEcfU/kr gSA bl izdkj izrhr gks jgk gS fd vfHk;qDr ,d vkijkf/kd izo`fRr dk O;fDr gS] tks ckj&ckj vijk/k dkfjr dj jgk gS vkSj tekur ds izko/kkuksa dk nq:i;ksx dj jgk gSA izdj.k esa vHkh vUos"k.k iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA vr% mi;qZDr leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] bl izdze ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who has committed contemptuous acts by violating previous bail conditions multiple times.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Bablu Meena @ Laxmichand
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
