The Single Bench of the Rajasthan High Court allowed a bail application filed by appellants challenging an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The court dispensed with the second hearing of the bail application.
Allowed the bail application and issued a warrant as per anticipatory bail order dated 01.07.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1317/2024
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal & Mr. Waseem Akaram For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
30/08/2024
v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] dksVk }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk] jsYos dkWyksuh] dksVk 'kgj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &201@2024 vUrxZr 307] 395] 365] 341] 323] 143 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 3 ¼2½ ¼oh½ vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-7- 2024] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i=
[CRLAS-1317/2024]
(2 of 3)
varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk fujLr fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g tekur vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vkgrx.k lquhy o n'kZu dks tks pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa] muesa ls dksbZ Hkh pksV izk.k?kkrd izfrosfnr ugha gqbZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd tks Hkh pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa] og lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh gSA izkFkhZx.k fnukad 25-6-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vihykFkhZx.k bejku o lyeku [kku ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA eksgEen 'kjhQ mQZ fcV~Vw ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,d vkif/kd izdj.k ntZ gwvk Fkk] ftlesa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA vihykFkhZx.k ls dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN dh tkuh 'ks"k ugha gSA vr% ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZx.k dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa gh eksgEen 'kQh mQZ fcV~Vw }kjk vkgr n'kZu o lquhy ds lkFk lfj;s o ikbZi ls ekjihV djuk vafdr gSA bl ekjihV esa vkgr ds flj ij pksV vkbZ gS] ftlds ifj.kkeLo:i mlds flj ij 8 Vkads vk;s gSA vihykFkhZ ds fo:) xaHkhj izd`fr ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij eqDr ugha fn;k tk;sA
mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;k ,oa i=koyh dk v/;;u fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij vkgr n'kZu ds flj ij pksV dkfjr djus vkSj mldh tsc ls :i;s fudkyus dk vk{ksi ugha gSA vkgr n'kZu us /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vius dFkuksa esa jgh'k }kjk mlds flj ij pksV dkfjr djus vkSj eatwj }kjk iSls fudkyus dk vk{ksi yxk;k gSA izkFkhZx.k fnukad 25-6-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vihykFkhZx.k bejku o lyeku [kku ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA eksgEen 'kjhQ mQZ fcV~Vw ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,d vkif/kd izdj.k ntZ gwvk Fkk] ftlesa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA vihykFkhZx.k ls dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN dh tkuh 'ks"k ugha gSA vr% bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj dha tkrh gSa vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 186@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-7-2024 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ&izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s
[CRLAS-1317/2024]
(3 of 3)
dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
Jitendra Singh Panwar/229
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail under Section 439 CrPC 1973 is maintainable despite the silence of respondents in interim hearing.
Whether a second criminal appeal numbered CRLAS-1317/2024 could be decided on merits when one case hung up.
Whether the High Court was empowered to decide the bail petition despite violation of rules of court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohammad Sharif @ Bittu @ Chiku
Imran @ Sonu
Salman Khan @ Shanu
State Of Rajasthan
Darshan Singh
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
