Allowed

Anil Kumar Nitharwal S/O Sh. Naruram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2024CRLAS/1273/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three bail appeals against rejection of bail in a case registered under IPC sections 364A, 395, 327, 120-B and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(va). Court noted accused and complainant knew each other, no money was actually paid, single pain-related injury, custody since 04-06-2024, charge sheet filed and no criminal antecedents, and allowed the appeals granting bail on

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; trial court rejection orders dated 15-06-2024 set aside; release on bond of ₹1,00,000 plus two sureties of ₹25,000 each, subject to attendance conditions.

Anil Kumar Nitharwal S/O Sh. Naruram Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:36674]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1273/2024

¶4

Anil Kumar Nitharwal S/o Sh. Naruram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gadkanet, P.s. Ajeetgarh, District Neem Ka Thana(Raj). (Presently Confined At District Jail, Bundi(Raj), Arrested On 04/6/2024).

¶5

Vikram Ghosalya S/o Sh. Ramkumar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ghosalya Ki Dhani, Dhanuta, P.s. Amarsar, Jaipur Rural (Raj). (Presently Confined At District Jail, Bundi(Raj), Arrested On 04/6/2024).

¶6

----Appellants

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

Akash S/o Sh. Nemlal, Kaidara Ki Jhopriya Karwar Bundi Rajasthan

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1229/2024

¶13

Jai Singh Son Of Bhajanlal, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Balariya Police Station Chouth Ka Barwara District Sawaimadhopur.

¶14

Vikram Singh Son Of Birbal, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Fo Ramsinghpura Police Station Chouth Ka Barwara District Sawaimadhopur.

¶15

Golu Son Of Guliband, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Dekwa Police Kotwali District Sawaimadhopur. All Are At Present In District Jail, Bundi.

¶16

----Appellants

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp.

¶19

Akash Son Of Nemlal, Resident Of Kaidar Ki Jhopariya, Karwar District Bundi.

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1272/2024

¶22

Khemchand Nitharwal S/o Sh. Mangilal Nitharwal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Tejpura, Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:36674]

[CRLAS-1273/2024]

Rural.(Rajasthan).

----Appellant

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶30

Akash S/o Shri Nemlal, R/o Kaidara Ki Jhopriya, Karwar, Baundi, Rajasthan.

¶31

----Respondents

¶32

For Appellant(s)	: Mr. Omprakash Godara for Mr. Ved
	Prakash Sogarwal Mr. Harendra Singh Mr. Pushpendra Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP Mohd. Arfan Khan for complainant

¶33

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶34

Order

¶35

02/09/2024

¶36

v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] cwUnh }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk] djoj ftyk&cwUnh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&127@2024 vUrxZr 364&,] 395] 327] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 3(2) (v), 3(2) (va) vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 15-6-2024] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk fujLr fd, x;s gSa] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g rhu tekur vihysa is'k dha xbZ gSaA

¶37

cgl lquh xbZA vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA okLrfodrk esa vfHk;ksxh vkSj vfHk;qDrx.k ,d nwljs ls ifjfpr Fks rFkk muds chp iSls dk dksbZ ysunu gqvk FkkA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;ksxh }kjk fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ jkf'k vfHk;qDrx.k dks ugha nh xbZA Lo;a vfHk;ksxh us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ;g dgk gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k gh mls okgu ls mrkjdj pys x;s FksA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ifjoknh ds 'kjhj ij dksbZ pksV ugha vkbZ gS rFkk ek= nnZ dh f'kdk;r lEcU/kh pksV gSA vihykFkhZx.k fnukad 4-6-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA muls vc dksbZ vUos"k.k gksuk 'ks"k ugha gSA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku ds mijkar vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftldh vUoh{kk

[2024:RJ-JP:36674]

[CRLAS-1273/2024]

(3 of 3)

esa le; yxsxkA vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA vr% ;g rhuksa tekur vihysa Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSA

¶42

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k ifjoknh dks ,d fcuk uEcj dh LdksZfi;ks esa vigj.k djds ys x;s vkSj mlls fQjkSrh dh ekax dhA vfHk;qDrx.k ij /kkjk 364&,] 395] 327] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 3(2) (v), 3(2) (va) vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds xaHkhj vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij eqDr ugha fd;k tk;sA

¶43

mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;k ,oa i=koyh dk v/;;u fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj vfHk;ksxh vkSj vfHk;qDrx.k ,d nwljs ls ifjfpr Fks rFkk muds chp iSls dk ysunsu gqvk gSA vfHk;ksxh }kjk fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ jkf'k vfHk;qDrx.k dks nh xbZ gks] ,slk izdV ugha gqvk gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vuqlkj vfHk;qDrx.k gh vfHk;ksxh dks okgu ls mrkjdj pys x;s FksA vfHk;ksxh ds 'kjhj ij tks ,dek= pksV dkfjr gksuk nf'kZr gqvk gS og nnZ dh f'kdk;r lEcU/kh lk/kkj.k pksV gSA vihykFkhZx.k fnukad 4-6-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA muls vc dksbZ vUos"k.k gksuk 'ks"k ugha gSA izdj.k esa vuqla/kku ds mijkar vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftldh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gksuk ugha ik;k x;k gSA vr% bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶44

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g rhuksa tekur vihysa Lohdkj dha tkrh gSa vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk tekur vkosnu i=ksa la[;k 145@2024 rFkk 146@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 15-6-2024 vikLr fd, tkrs gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izR;sd vihykFkhZx.k&izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶45

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶46

JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /160 to 162

Anil Kumar Nitharwal S/O Sh. Naruram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Nitharwal S/O Sh. Naruram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramniwas S/O Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Sharif @ Bittu @ Chiku S/O Rashid Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Saiya @ Sahiman W/O Mobin Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Devthiya S/O Sultan Singh Devthiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar S/O Phoolchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Saakir S/O Rasid Vs State of Rajasthan