This is a single-paragraph order dismissing the petitioner's anticipatory bail application because the petitioner had already been arrested in connection with the FIR, rendering the petition infructuous.
The bail application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7457]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 952/2024
Ramkesh S/o Latoor, R/o Gumladu Ki Dhani, Baswa, Police Station Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ravindra Kumar for Mr. MeghrajMeena |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
13/02/2024
Apprehending the arrest in connection with FIR No.03/2024 registered at Police Station Baswa, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section 379 of I.P.C., the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that petition has become infructuous as accused-petitioner has been arrested.
Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
157-SURAJ KUMAR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be considered now that the petitioner has been arrested.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramkesh S/o Latoor
State of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
