Allowed

Himanshu S/O Shri Kajod Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Oct 2024CRLMB/8379/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail applications filed by two accused petitioners under Section 483 BNSS for offences under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, and 307. The Court held it just to release them on personal bond with sureties without expressing an opinion on merits, citing omnibus allegations and completion of investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Himanshu S/O Shri Kajod Mal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:42983]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11364/2024

¶4

Rajendra @ Raju S/o Shri Jhabarmal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Seel Ka Bada Tan Lapua Police Station Reengus, District Sikar Rajasthan (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8379/2024 Himanshu S/o Shri Kajod Mal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bojha Wali Dhani Tan Kotri Dhaylan Police Station Reengus District Sikar Rajasthan (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Sharma Mr. K.K. Bhinda For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, for complainant

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶17

Order

¶18

10/10/2024

¶19

These bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 627/2023 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for offences u/S 147, 148, 149, 323, 341 & 307 of IPC.

[2024:RJ-JP:42983]

[CRLMB-11364/2024]

(2 of 3)

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submit that the FIR has been lodged by the brother of the injured Sanjay and in the statements recorded u/S 161 CrPC, the injured Sanjay had levelled omnibus allegations against all the accused persons but no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused petitioners. Counsels also submit that the accused petitioners are in custody since 24.06.2024 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that there are two grievous injuries inflicted by the accused persons to the injured Sanjay.

¶26

Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the challan papers.

¶27

Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioners so also the fact that there are omnibus allegations and no specific overt act has been assigned to any of the accused petitioners and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶28

Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)

(3 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:42983]

[CRLMB-11364/2024]

each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶33

Let a copy of this order be placed in connected file/s.

¶34

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶35

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /71-72

Himanshu S/O Shri Kajod Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu S/O Shri Kajod Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra S/O Badri Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Anoop Singh S/O Shribhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankur S/O Ramswroop, Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Jatia S/O Banshilal Vs Narcotics Control Bureau

Vikas Chakwa S/O Shri Sher Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh S/O Shri Ratan Singh @ Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan