Allowed

Sandeep S/O Dayaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Apr 2024CRLMB/1102/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an accused charged with offences including attempt to murder in FIR No.705/2023. The court granted bail subject to a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Sandeep S/O Dayaram Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:19417]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

1102/2024

¶5

Sandeep S/o Dayaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Majri Kalan, Police Station Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Sub District Jail Behror).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Lalit Gautam Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

25/04/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.705/2023 registered at Police Station Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 325 & 307 of IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that after completion of investigation

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:19417]

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1102/2024]

¶18

charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Sandeep S/o Dayaram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

GAURAV SHARMA /51

Sandeep S/O Dayaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep S/O Dayaram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Rathore S/O Shri Mukesh Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahender Kumar Vs State

Pankaj Natani S/O Shri Ghanshyam Natani, Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Kumar S/O Ramphal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rinku @ Avnesh @ Praveen S/O Kesharam Vs the State of Rajasthan