Allowed

Mohin Khan S/O Jaikamdeen v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Sept 2024CRLMB/7946/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application filed by three accused petitioners. The court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case, imposing conditions regarding a personal bond and prohibiting public celebration of release.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail under personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, subject to conditions including no public celebration of release.

Mohin Khan S/O Jaikamdeen Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37564]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7946/2024

¶4

Mohin Khan S/o Jaikamdeen, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bada Baas Ghegholi, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan). (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶5

Sameen Khan S/o Nijar Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bada Baas Ghegholi, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan). (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶6

Bablu Meena S/o Satish Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Pandit Ka Baas Ghegholi, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan). (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar Ms. Usha Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, Public Prosecutor

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

¶13

05/09/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.276/2024 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Alwar for offences under Sections 419, 420, 465 & 120-B of IPC and under Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since long. Counsel further submits that the Police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the

[2024:RJ-JP:37564]

[CRLMB-7946/2024]

(2 of 3)

matter and the petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Counsel further submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, therefore, they may be released on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners so also the fact that there is no other criminal case pending against the petitioners and also the fact that the Police after completion of the investigation has submitted chargesheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that these accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the

[2024:RJ-JP:37564]

[CRLMB-7946/2024]

(3 of 3)

aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the petitioners shall not celebrate their release in public and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail.

¶28

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶29

Satyendra/70

Mohin Khan S/O Jaikamdeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohin Khan S/O Jaikamdeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baluram Vs State

Umrao Singh @ Ambu Singh S/O Shri Prahalad Vs State of Rajasthan

Altaf S/O Ummed Vs State of Rajasthan

Mustkim S/O Talim Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarup @ Manni S/O Shri Jasudin Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshanlal Meena S/O Narayan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan