Allowed

Rahul S/O Kamrudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jul 2024CRLMB/6058/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur allowed S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6058/2024, granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC, noting the dismissal of the earlier FIR and absence of fresh proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC subject to conditions including appearing when summoned, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permis

Rahul S/O Kamrudeen Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:28428]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

6058/2024

¶5

Rahul S/o Kamrudeen, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gram Nangal Mojiya, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Adv. For : Mr. C.G. Chopra, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

08/07/2024

¶14

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk fd'kux<+ ckl] ftyk [ksjFky] frtkjk esa iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 22@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 379 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa fxjQrkjh dh vk'kadk ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k fd;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku mlds fo#) dksbZ lk{; ,df=r ugha gqbZ gS] dfFkr Vªksyh cjken gksdj egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS] vfHk;qDr dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] izkFkhZ dks vdkj.k gh fxjQrkj fd;k x;k rks mlds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk

¶15

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6058/2024]

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:28428]

¶17

guu gksxk] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa lgvfHk;qDr }kjk ifjoknh dh Vªksyh pqjkus o vkxs vUrfjr fd;s tkus vkfn dk vkjksi gSA lgvfHk;qDr tQ:n~nhu }kjk iwNrkN uksV esa ;g [kqyklk fd;k gS fd mlus jkgqy o vU; O;fDr;ksa ds lkFk feydj dqN vU; Vªksyh Hkh pksjh dh FkhA vU; dksbZ Vªksyh pksjh gqbZ gS] rks ml izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vko';drkuqlkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls vuqla/kku gks ldrk gS] ysfdu orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr jkgqy ds fo#) dksbZ Bksl lkexzh ugha vk;h gSA

¶21

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa dh jks'kuh esa] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ jkgqy iq= de:nnhu }kjk izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn og bl ekeys esa fxjQrkjh dh voLFkk esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk Lo;a dk ca/k i= ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkus ds Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh@

¶23

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6058/2024]

¶24

[2024:RJ-JP:28428]

¶25

vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dh larqf"V dh is'k dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls fuEu 'krksaZ ds lkFk tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos%&

¶26

1- fd izkFkhZ iqfyl vf/kdkjh }kjk iwNs tkusokys ifjiz'uksa dk mRrj nsus ds fy;s tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksxkA

¶27

2- fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys ds rF;ksa ls voxr fdlh O;fDr dks U;k;ky; ;k fdlh iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k ,sls rF;ksa dks izdV u djus ds fy;s eukus ds okLrs izR;{k% vFkok ijks{k :i ls mls dksbZ mRizsj.kk] /kedh ;k opu ugha nsxkA

¶28

3- fd izkFkhZ fcuk U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqefr ds Hkkjr ugha NksM+sxkA

¶29

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶30

Murari Lal Sharma /654

Rahul S/O Kamrudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul S/O Kamrudeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh S/O Shri Panchulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lohadiram S/O Harya Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilraj S/O Sh. Kamal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pasho Murmu @ Vasu S/O Shri Aprho Murmu Vs State of Rajasthan

Manohar Singh S/O Sawai Singh, Vs Premsingh S/O Gokul Singh

Bhawani Singh @ Bhanu S/O Rameshchand Vs State of Rajasthan