Allowed

Dilraj S/O Sh. Kamal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Jul 2024CRLMB/6678/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, confined in judicial custody, sought release in an IPC case involving offences under sections 323, 341, 307, and 34, arguing false implication due to the trial's expected duration.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail via personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to satisfy trial Court.

Dilraj S/O Sh. Kamal Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:28023]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

6678/2024

¶5

Dilraj S/o Sh. Kamal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Raawal, P.s. Kundera, Distt. Sawai Madhopur (Presently Confined In Distt. Jail, Sawaimadhopur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Joshi, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

05/07/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.238/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali (Sawai Madhopur), District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 307 & 34 of IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:28023]

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-6678/2024]

¶18

custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for complainant has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Dilraj S/o Sh. Kamal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /11

Dilraj S/O Sh. Kamal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilraj S/O Sh. Kamal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanuman Sahay Meena @ H.R. Meena S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suvalal Khinchi @ Tota @ Suaa S/O Manohar Lal Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/O Soneram Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh S/O Shri Panchulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lohadiram S/O Harya Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Bawriya S/O Shri Mangilal Bawariya Vs State of Rajasthan