The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Pasho Murmu, who was in judicial custody for over two years in connection with under trial of rape and murder. The court noted nomandatory or mandatory ground for continued detention.
Bail granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:28390]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.
5647/2024
Pasho Murmu @ Vasu S/o Shri Aprho Murmu, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gram Dehuti, Post Budanimothpur, Police Station Dalkhola, District Uttar Dingajpur (West Bengal) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
08/07/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk enuxat] ftyk vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&356 @22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 302] 201] 34 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] oSokfgd erHksn dks ysdj fookn lg vfHk;qDr Jhjke gsEcjkse mQZ lquhjke ls Fkk ftlls izkFkhZ dk ekeyk fHkUu gS] tks ifjfLFkfrtU; lk{; crk;h gS og detksj izd`fr dh gSA lHkh egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds
[2024:RJ-JP:28390]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-5647/2024]
gSa] izkFkhZ nks o"kZ ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu fnukad 08-02-24 dks egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku 'ks"k gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, vLohdkj fd;k x;k FkkA erd i{k o vfHk;qDr Jhjke gsEcjkse mQZ lquhjke ds chp fookn gksuk vkSj mldks ysdj orZeku vfHk;qDr }kjk Jhjke gsEcjkse mQZ lquhjke ds lkFk feydj erd dh gR;k dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gSA dksbZ izR;{kn'khZ xokg ugha gSA vfHk;qDr ls [kwu vkywnk diMs cjken gksus dk rF; vfHk;kstu i{k }kjk crk;k x;k gSA egRoiw.kZ xokgku lfgr 15 xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds gSaA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku ys[kc) gks tkus ds rF; dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr iklks eqewZ mQZ oklw iq= viksZ eqewZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl
[2024:RJ-JP:28390]
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-5647/2024]
ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /11
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charging him with murder (IPC 302) during his extended judicial custody.
Whether the circumstances of the case necessitate immediate bail for the petitioner detained in judicial custody.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Pasho Murmu @ Vasu
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
